TWO ARTICLES OF INTEREST ON TRIAL ADVOCACY FROM CILP
Bohrer, David C. Casenote. Knocking the eagle off the patent owner's
shoulder: Chiron holds that jurors don't have to be told that a patent is
presumed valid. (Chiron Corp. v. Genentech, Inc., 363 F.3d 1247, Fed.
Cir. 2004.) 21 Santa Clara Computer & High Tech. L.J. 259-288 (2004).
Wilenfeld, Joshua. Note. Newly compelling: reexamining judicial construction of juries in the aftermath of (Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306, 2003) 104 Colum. L. Rev. 2291-2327 (2004)
shoulder: Chiron holds that jurors don't have to be told that a patent is
presumed valid. (Chiron Corp. v. Genentech, Inc., 363 F.3d 1247, Fed.
Cir. 2004.) 21 Santa Clara Computer & High Tech. L.J. 259-288 (2004).
Wilenfeld, Joshua. Note. Newly compelling: reexamining judicial construction of juries in the aftermath of (Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306, 2003) 104 Colum. L. Rev. 2291-2327 (2004)
posted by Ethel Fiderer at 5:11 AM
1 Comments:
Vous avez un blog très agréable et je l'aime, je vais placer un lien de retour à lui dans un de mon blogs qui égale votre contenu. Il peut prendre quelques jours mais je ferai besure pour poster un nouveau commentaire avec le lien arrière.
Merci pour est un bon blogger.
Post a Comment
<< Home